![]() You will decide the sigma for each ship, I will decide the dispersion. So lets have an example shall we? we both have a hypothetical ship. Now some people might be saying i'm the grammar police as far as saying sigma is not accuracy. This does not cover vertical dispersion, but that isnt on a formula, its determined mostly by shell velocity. QE/Warspite/Hood : Slightly tighter dispersion than other RN BBs = R x 10.3 + 51 Graf Spee(and some new large cruisers): Unique formula = R x 8.4 + 48 These are the formulas for every ship in the game. (R=Range in km) Result in metersĬhikuma, Albany, Diana, Aurora, Altanta, Zao : Uses DD formula Each line has its own dispersion formula, meaning no ship in in a line is more accurate than another, since they use the same dispersion formula The actual number that determines accuracy is dispersion. which is again, not accuracy. you can view the difference HERE. Sigma has absolutely nothing to do with accuracy. Questoin: Higher Sigma, means tighter shell grouping correct? Stop overdoing yourself and go take a vacation MouseĪlso you forgot Stalingrad with 2.65 sigma Edited Octoby ValkyrWarframeĭoesn't Colorado still have different sigma values for the different hulls even after the HP buff? Or did they standardize it? ![]() Here's the sigma for the battleships currently released:Ģ.0 - Imperator Nikolai I, Ishizuchi, Myogiġ.8 - Duke of York, King George V, Gneisenau, Ashitakaġ.8 - Amagi, Roma, Bismarck, Tirpitz, Monarch, Richelieuġ.8 - Friedrich der Große, Izumo, Lion, Musashi Be careful, not all of them are always up to date (though they're usually pretty good). You won't find it anywhere except on some third party sites like those linked above. Where do you find the Sigma of each ship listed? Looking to compare the BB lines once I'm done with the USN line.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |